<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warning: Don&#8217;t Be an Achiever!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlivingbylearning.com/2008/04/03/warning-dont-be-an-achiever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlivingbylearning.com/2008/04/03/warning-dont-be-an-achiever/</link>
	<description>Learn, Grow, Explore, Change the World</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nymfa</title>
		<link>http://www.onlivingbylearning.com/2008/04/03/warning-dont-be-an-achiever/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>nymfa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlivingbylearning.com/2008/04/03/warning-dont-be-an-achiever/#comment-336</guid>
		<description>thanks for visiting! this is an interesting post! i always wanted to be an achiever, but i guess, just like my daughter, i am a creative rebel. much to my dismay at times, my hubby seems to be a traditional loner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for visiting! this is an interesting post! i always wanted to be an achiever, but i guess, just like my daughter, i am a creative rebel. much to my dismay at times, my hubby seems to be a traditional loner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.onlivingbylearning.com/2008/04/03/warning-dont-be-an-achiever/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlivingbylearning.com/2008/04/03/warning-dont-be-an-achiever/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Just as you say, putting achievement together with materialism and unconcern about the feelings of others seems odd. Are they merely reporting characteristics that they found tended to be grouped together, or are they adjusting the personal differences for the sake of coming up with tidy categories? Where does "being influential" part company with "being rich and famous" or "being ambitious"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as you say, putting achievement together with materialism and unconcern about the feelings of others seems odd. Are they merely reporting characteristics that they found tended to be grouped together, or are they adjusting the personal differences for the sake of coming up with tidy categories? Where does &#8220;being influential&#8221; part company with &#8220;being rich and famous&#8221; or &#8220;being ambitious&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dianeinjapan</title>
		<link>http://www.onlivingbylearning.com/2008/04/03/warning-dont-be-an-achiever/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>dianeinjapan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 13:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlivingbylearning.com/2008/04/03/warning-dont-be-an-achiever/#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I'm not sure what I think about this survey.  I think it's interesting, to be sure, but I don't like having to put myself or other people into any kind of box.  Having said that, I definitely believe that I (along with my husband and both kids) fit most comfortably in the Creatives category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m not sure what I think about this survey.  I think it&#8217;s interesting, to be sure, but I don&#8217;t like having to put myself or other people into any kind of box.  Having said that, I definitely believe that I (along with my husband and both kids) fit most comfortably in the Creatives category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
